Progressives Versus The Founders

Print

spalding.jpg“Are you serious?”

That’s how a visibly annoyed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi replied when a reporter dared ask where the Constitution grants Congress authority to require individuals to buy health insurance.

This vexed response from the House’s top Democrat last fall reveals the extent to which the intellectual, cultural and political elites have blithely abandoned the principles of America’s founding as outdated, defective and of little relevance to modern governance.

How—and why—did this come to be? The abandonment of first principles began about a hundred years ago as an intellectual project involving mostly academics and writers. It grew into a popular reform effort under the banner of “progressivism.”

Progressive thinkers sought to “re-found” America according to ideas alien to Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Hamilton and Madison. Repudiating the Founders’ belief in the existence of self-evident truths, progressives saw only relative values. Similarly, they claimed, man enjoys no permanent rights endowed by God, only changing rights held at the indulgence of government.

With no eternal truths or permanent rights, Americans must be governed by a “living” Constitution, one that endlessly evolves and grows with the times.

The progressive movement—first under a Republican president, Theodore Roosevelt, and then a Democratic one, Woodrow Wilson—set forth the platform of modern American liberalism: Progress means a form of government able to engineer a better society, assuring equal outcomes and redistributing wealth.

President Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal and President Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society were grand steps toward achieving the progressive platform.

"Progressives insist the modern world is so complex and problematic that we need an activist government to manage political life and human affairs."

And today, under President Barack Obama and the current Congress, we see a more aggressive move in this direction. Progressives insist the modern world is so complex and problematic that we need an activist government to manage political life and human affairs.

This new liberalism seeks to transform our constitutional structure of limited government into an increasingly powerful, centralized government focused on social reform. The rise of the modern administrative state, the growth of bureaucracy at every level, and the host of benefits the public has come to expect from government all undercut and pervert the American idea of self-government.

More than 170 years ago, Alexis de Tocqueville warned Americans of an emerging danger to democracy: “soft despotism.” This insidious threat, the French political thinker explained, could reduce a self-governing people to “nothing more than a herd of timid and industrious animals of which the government is the shepherd.”

The danger is greater than ever. The Left is pushing America toward European-style centralization of power. Liberal panjandrums seek an even more highly regulated economy, nationalization of industries and socialized health care. Lawmakers increasingly leave the “details” of how to implement legislation to unelected bureaucrats. 

This isn’t progress. It’s the revival of a failed, undemocratic and illiberal kind of statism.

"Progressive ideas have not completely won the day. And in important ways, the progressive liberals have had to adapt to realities defined by the American political tradition."

However, the slow Europeanization of America isn’t inevitable, and it’s not too late. Progressive ideas have not completely won the day. And in important ways, the progressive liberals have had to adapt to realities defined by the American political tradition.

Even so, the dominance of progressive arguments—in our schools and in the public square, as well as in our politics—has significantly weakened the very foundations of constitutionalism and limited government. That, of course, makes it all the more necessary to defend and recover the ideas of the Founders.

To flourish in the 21st century, America doesn’t need to redefine or remake itself by rejecting core principles in favor of more stylish beliefs. Rather, what’s needed is a great renewal of the foundational principles that are the true roots of American greatness.

We should focus on six priorities:

"Reclaiming America’s future will require a concerted, monumental effort to push back progressive liberalism’s assault on individual liberty and recover the Founders’ principles in our political culture."

Thankfully, more and more Americans realize how deeply the progressive movement has transformed our politics and society. We see this in town hall meetings, “tea party” protests and recent election returns.

Taxpayers and voters are looking to the principles of the American founding. Not merely as a matter of historical curiosity, but for its philosophical grounding, practical wisdom and limitless spirit of self-government and independence.

Reclaiming America’s future will require a concerted, monumental effort to push back progressive liberalism’s assault on individual liberty and recover the Founders’ principles in our political culture.

In a world of moral confusion, of arbitrary and unlimited government, the founding provides our best access to permanent truths. It’s our best ground from which to repulse the whole progressive project to remake America. It is still our rock of assurance and direction, ready to guide us to the blessings of liberty, for ourselves and our posterity.

Are we serious? Yes, Madame Speaker, we are.

Matthew Spalding, Ph.D.,  is director of the B. Kenneth Simon Center for American Studies at The Heritage Foundation.
This article is based on portions of his book,
 “We Still Hold These Truths: Rediscovering Our Principles, Reclaiming Our Future” (ISI Books).

Click here to read the ReAL Book Review of We Still Hold These Truths